Golden Age of Squirreling - Documented

 

There are thousands of alterations to LRH issues - this is no effort to document each one.

Foreword

The subject of Scientology, as given in LRH issues, has been replaced by a new subject called the "Scientology Religion".

The subject of Scientology and the "Scientology Religion" are NOT the same thing.

The subject of Scientology is contained in LRH issues only.

The "Scientology Religion" has other authors than LRH, and their writings are presented under the legal title "based on the works of LRH."


- - - - - - - -


In October 1993 a booklet was issued entitled Description of the Scientology Religion.

This booklet was handed out at the IAS event to announce tax exemption.

The booklet defines two words –

Scientology
The Scientology religion

It defines Scientology as –

Scientology is an applied religious philosophy. Its goal is to bring an individual to an understanding of himself and his life as a spiritual being and in relationship to the universe as a whole.

It defines the Scientology religion as –

The Scientology religion is based exclusively upon L. Ron Hubbard’s research, writings and recorded lectures.

The key word in the definition of the "Scientology religion" is based upon.

And that is exactly what they have been doing – altering, deleting and fabricating LRH issues and obtaining a new copyright under the legal title "based on the works of LRH."

In these new copyrighted works – CSI is the author, not LRH.

In other words – they have replaced LRH as Source!

Scientology is the works of LRH where LRH is the author.

The "Scientology religion" is based upon the works of LRH, where CSI is the author.

See the difference?


- - - - - - - -


The last corporate entity to practice the subject of Scientology was the Church of Scientology of California. In the early 1980’s a group of conspirators took over the Church. The conspirators dismantled the Church of Scientology of California and replaced it with 3 new corporations –

Church of Spiritual Technology - CST
Religious Technology Center - RTC
Church of Scientology International - CSI

The above three corporate entities market the "Scientology Religion".

The way this is accomplished is that CSI alters, deletes, and fabricates LRH issues such as LRH HCOBs, books, and tapes. RTC then approves these alterations, deletions, and fabrications made to LRH issues by CSI. CST then accepts the "based on the works of LRH" issues and archives them in underground storage vaults "for future generations."

The above three corporate entities are co-conspirators in a fraud being perpetrated on the paying Scientology public. The executives of these corporations and Church promo make the false statement to the paying Scientology public that what they are purchasing and receiving is "pure, unadulterated LRH technology". They make this fraudulent statement while knowing full well that they have made thousands of alterations, deletions, and fabrications to LRH issues.

The public is in a condition of Confusion. They think they are in the Church of Scientology, receiving Scientology. They are actually in a new corporate structure that markets the "Scientology religion."

The formula for Confusion is – Find Out Where You Are

 

Alteration of Scientology Axiom 3:


Axiom 3 on page 148 in the LRH book Phoenix Lectures -

Space, Energy, Objects, Form and Time are the result of considerations made and/or agreed upon or not by the static, and are perceived solely because the static considers that it can perceive them.


Axiom 3 on page 73 in the 1988 squirrel CSI Book Scientology 0-8 –

Space, Energy, Objects, Form and Time are the result of considerations made and/or agreed upon by the static, and are perceived solely because the static considers that it can perceive them.


- - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Fabrication of a false datum on Tone Arm Action:


The 1988 Church of Spiritual Technology squirrel version of the book E-Meter Essentials has added this false datum:

An acceptable minimum of Tone Arm motion is 2.5 divisions per hour of auditing.

That false datum does not appear in the original LRH book E-Meter Essentials or any other LRH issue. Some suppressive manufactured that false datum.


Here is a quote from HCOB 25 September 1963 Adequate Tone Arm Motion:

Amount Per Session ------- Session Rating

25 Divs -----------------------Excellent
20 Divs -----------------------Good
15 Divs -----------------------Acceptable
10 Divs -----------------------Poor
5 Divs ------------------------Unacceptable
0 Divs ------------------------Harmful


The above quote shows the amount of tone arm motion for a 2 ½ hour session.

The Church of Spiritual Technology datum says that 2.5 divisions per hour is an acceptable minimum. In other words that datum says that 6.25 divisions per 2 ½ hour session is an acceptable minimum. That datum is false, it takes 15 divisions of tone arm action per 2 ½ hour session to qualify as being acceptable.

(For further data on this suppressive datum - see the link ronstech.org)


- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of PDC tape 20:


LRH original
PDC tape 20 -

Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced.
Did you ever read poor old George Orwell's 1984? Yes,yes, that's wonderful.
That would be--- could be the palest imagined shadow of what a world would be like under the rule of the secret use of Scientology with no remedy in existence.

L. Ron Hubbard library squirrel version of PDC tape 20 -

Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced.

The rest is Deleted.

- - - - - - - - - - - -


Here is another section of the LRH original PDC tape 20 -

It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't horde it, don't hold it; and if you ever do use any Black Dianetics, use it on the guy who pulled Scientology out of sight and made it so it wasn't available. Because he's the boy who would be electing himself "The New Order." And we don't need any more new orders. All those orders, as far as I am concerned, have been filled.


Here is the L. Ron Hubbard library squirrel version of PDC tape 20 -

It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't hoard it and don't hold it.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

More examples of alterations to LRH tapes:

Over 400 words have been deleted from the LRH tape Studying, Introduction.

Over 600 words have been deleted from the LRH tape Establishment Officer Tape # 1, ESTO’s Instant Hat.


- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of HCOB 1 July 1985 CS Series 73 RA:


Here is the end of the 12 page LRH original HCOB C/S Series 73RA-

Due to the tremendous number of technical advances which have been made in the past decade, and the nature of these advances, maintaining the No-Interference Area rules to ensure that pcs move rapidly up the Bridge becomes the responsibility of every org, every mission, every unit and every individual Scientologist on this planet.

It is not only a responsibility.

It is a trust.


Here is the end of the 5 page squirrel HCOB 2 August 1990 CS Series 73RB –

DELETED – the above ending is DELETED – along with 7 other pages of the original.


Yet enforcement of the above HCOB was considered vital by LRH.

A study of the LRH original shows that OT 7 is being squirreled.

For a full report on the sabotaging of OT 7 – see An OT 7’s Story.


- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Fabrication of HCOB 18 June 1990 C/S Series 124:

This HCOB says it is a compilation – but when you look up the LRH references they supposedly compiled it from – you realize its not a compilation at all – they wrote the entire HCOB themselves.


- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Fabrication of off-source policies called "Scientology Policy Directives"

CSI has authored over a 100 "Scientology Policy Directives." There is no LRH policy that authorizes this type of issue. So orgs are being run on CSI squirrel policy.

Per HCO PL 5 March 1965 Policy: Source Of –

If it is not in an HCO Policy Letter, it is not policy.


- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Tech degrade

The LRH book Dianetics Today is no longer being printed and sold.

 

Tech degrade -

Removal of data on GPMs from LRH tapes.


Per HCOPL 17 June 1970 Technical Degrades …

"…all the material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use."


Commentary:

The Goals Problem Mass is a mental mechanism that LRH gave many lectures on. It is vital case data for auditors, case supervisors, preclears and pre-OTs. The likely justifier for removing data on GPMs is that they are auditied a different way than the original process developed for auditing them. That justifier is invalid, here’s why:

It is vitally important for auditors and case supervisors to understand and recognize mental mechanisms. An auditor is defined as one who listens and computes. What he is computing is - what mental mechanism is currently manifesting in the preclear’s case. He then chooses the correct process to handle that mental mechanism.

Various processes have been developed down through the years to audit engrams. In 1950 they used a process called "repeater technique." Later a process called R3R was developed for running engrams.

Now – just because R3R was developed does not mean that "repeater technique" is no longer ever used. Worse yet, how crazy would it be to delete data about engrams from LRH lectures because a better technique called R3R was developed to run engrams? An auditor needs to understand the mental mechanism called an engram, regardless of what process he is using to run them. The same idea applies to GPMs.

It is insane and suppressive to delete data on GPMs from LRH lectures. It is a mental mechanism that auditors, case supervisors, preclears and pre OTs need to understand, in order to assist them in handling that type of case, regardless of what technique or process they are going to use to handle it.


- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of the Auditors’ Code:


Here is the LRH issue of HCOPL 14 October 1968R The Auditor’s Code

I promise to cooperate fully with the legal organizations of Dianetics and Scientology as developed by L. Ron Hubbard in safeguarding the ethical use and practice of the subject according to the basics of Standard Tech.


The 1988 L. Ron Hubbard Library squirrel version in Scientology 0-8

I promise to cooperate fully with the authorized organizations of Dianetics and Scientology in safeguarding the ethical use and practice of those subjects.


- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of PDC Tape Two E-Meter: DEMO 1 December 1952:

1986 LRH version

He's learned that if you're agreeing if you're going to do anything physically with the Mest universe...

1991 squirrel version

He's learned that if you're going to do anything physically with the MEST universe...


- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of the LRH Book New Slant On Life:


Here is the LRH original book -

The politician, the reporter, the psychiatrist with his electric shock machine, the drug manufacturer, …


Here is the CSI squirrel book -

The politician, the reporter, the medico, the drug manufacturer, …


Note: There are 87 times where they alter LRH’s words in the CSI squirrel book.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of LRH book Introduction to Scientology Ethics:


1985 LRH version

No person under sentence or awaiting a Committee of Evidence may petition the Office of LRH.


1998 L. Ron Hubbard Library squirrel version (page 369)

No person under sentence or awaiting a Committee of Evidence may validly petition.


1975 LRH version –

12. Any other answer to a student’s demand for verbal technical or unusual solutions than the permitted:
"The material is in (HCO Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape)."
"What does your material state?"
"What word did you miss in the (Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape)?" and requests for unusual auditing solutions: "What did you actually do?"

1998 L. Ron Hubbard Library squirrel version

Deleted – all of the above is deleted in the squirrel version.


Note:
The alterations to this book are many and not limited to the above examples. This includes squirrel definitions in the Glossary which do not match Tech Dictionary definitions, such as the word Tone Scale.

- - - - - - - - - - -


Dianetics The Modern Science of Mental Health has also been re-written by CSI, along with 913 other titles listed in the Library of Congress records. CST is the owner of the copyrights for all of these re-writes.

In all of these re-written books – LRH is NOT the author. CSI is the author.

In order to make it appear to the public that LRH is the author, LRH’s name is made part of the copyrighted title, to deceive the public into thinking LRH wrote it:

SCIENTOLOGY: A NEW SLANT ON LIFE/L. RON HUBBARD

The above is the copyrighted TITLE of the book in Library of Congress records.

Notice that the book cover does not say BY L. Ron Hubbard.


In fact, none of the above re-writes are authored by LRH.

The issues are all "based on the works of LRH". The author is CSI.


- - - - - - - - - - - -


In 1988 the Life Improvement Courses are released by CSI, making the bottom of the Bridge a minefield of squirrel alterations - all "Based On TheWorks of LRH."

For example -

Here is the original LRH PL 10 September 1982 –

This is called rip off. It is the exchange condition of robbers, tax men, governments and other criminal elements.


Here is the CSI squirrel Life Improvement Course "Dynamics of Money" page 45 –

This is called rip off. It is the exchange condition of robbers, most tax men, many governments and criminal elements.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of the LRH Book Self Analysis:


The original LRH book –

The technical name of the questioning process used in this volume is Dianetics Straight Wire with Validation MEST processing. This is actually not self-auditing. It is auditing done on the reader by the author. Actually, the reader is being audited by L. Ron Hubbard. Straight Wire processing is relatively safe on any case and is the most elementary process in Dianetics.


The 1989 squirrel version by L. Ron Hubbard Library –

Deleted – the above paragraph is deleted.

Note –
As usual, the alterations to the book are not limited to the above example, given here.

- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of the LRH book History of Man:

Comparison of the 1980 version to the 1988 squirrel version -

In the book are several points where the words "Scientology 8-8008" were changed to "Technique 80" or to "Technique 88" (page 11, 23, 87 of the 1988 issue)

The last 2 Pages about Scn 8-8008 are totally missing!

On page 130 is written:
"TECHNIQUE 88 is an E-meter technique. It can be run without an E-meter but this permits all manner of dodging and evading. And there are usually six or ten entirely different banks in any preclear beside his own lots of places to dodge into."

But the next sentence is missing: But SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008 solves all this for you.

- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of LRH tape lecture Study - Evaluation of Information:

1982 LRH version -

But of course, all GPMs are composed of words. They're actually not composed of English words; they're composed of significances which are connected to masses. These masses are very capable of pushing somebody's head off.

GPM words are the lions, the high voltage, the various other professional danger points with which you live in Scientology - the words, the words of the GPMs, and that sort of thing.

And when you start fooling around with GPMs, you know very well you can knock your head off; you know very well that this is not something to lightly fool with; you know very well what they can do to somebody. You see somebody around on crutches gimping around, he's got arthritus - arthitus, exclamation point, you see, and so on. What's the matter with him? Well, he's just all wound up in a GPM someplace; that's really all that is wrong with him. Even if it's an engram, why, it's held in place with a GPM.


1987 squirrel version -

Deleted – all the above has been deleted.

Note - The deletions and alterations to this tape are not limited to the above example.

- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of LRH SHSBC tape of 22 Jun 1961 Running CCHs:
Alteration of LRH SHSBC tape of 20 Feb 1962 What Is A Withhold:


over 1000 words deleted from each tape


- - - - - - - - - - -

 

Alteration of PDC tape 15:


The LRH orginal PDC Tape 15 The Logics: Infinity-Valued Logic 4 Dec 1952 –

You can get a much better fee- I tell you as auditors quite frankly- it's much easier to get a great deal of money out of somebody who's on a down spiral into becoming MEST than it is to get money out of somebody who is going on an up spiral toward becoming theta.


The 1991 squirrel version

Deleted – the above paragraph is deleted.

- - - - - - - - - - -


As you can see from the above documentation -


CST, RTC and CSI have conspired to destroy LRH original teachings through a constant campaign of alterations, deletions and fabrications of LRH issues.

CST, RTC and CSI have also conspired to commit felony fraud on the paying public by making the false statement that all of the subject has been made available in a "pure, unadulterated form."


- - - - - - - - - -


MY EXPERIENCE AT SUNDAY SERVICE


15 Feb 00


I got a call from my local org recently about their Sunday Service, and found out some very interesting data.

As the 'service' got under way, we all stood, and there was a reading of the "Prayer for Total Freedom" contained at the back of the booklet. Now in my 15 years with Scientology, this was the first time I have EVER seen this "prayer". And based on all the books, PLs, Bulletins, etc. that I have read, and all the tapes I have listened to, this did NOT look like something Ron wrote. And again, there was no reference to the source of this 'prayer'.

Here is the actual text of the "Prayer for Total Freedom" contained in the booklet:

May the author of the universe enable all men to reach an understanding of their spiritual nature.

May awareness and understanding of life expand, so that all may come to know the author of the universe.

And may others also reach this understanding which brings Total Freedom.

At this time, we think of those whose liberty is threatened; of those who have suffered imprisonment for their beliefs; of those who are enslaved or martyred, and for all those who are brutalized, trapped or attacked.

We pray that human rights will be preserved so that all people may believe and worship freely, so that freedom will once again be seen in our land.

Freedom from war, and poverty, and want; freedom to be; freedom to do and freedom to have.

Freedom to use and understand man's potential - a potential that is God-given and Godlike.

And freedom to achieve that understanding and awareness that is Total Freedom.

May God let it be so.


(Thus endeth the reading of the holy words from the high-priests of the Church of Spiritual Technology.)


As the service progressed, there was a group process that was run on the 'congregation'. It did not have a title, it was simply being read out of the book by the 'minister'. It lasted about 15 or 20 min. At the end of the process, I asked the 'minister' for the source reference on that group process. He stumbled around looking through the 'sermon' for any reference to source, but after a minute or so, said that there wasn't one that he could find, and that we would find it after the 'sermon' was over.

We looked together for 5 min. or so for any references to the 'source' of the material contained in this book, including the group processes - there was none.

The only 'source' reference that I could find on the little booklet (An Introduction to Church Services) was contained in VERY SMALL printing at the bottom of the back cover that said:

1999 L. Ron Hubbard Library All Rights Reserved

Note –
L. Ron Hubbard Library is a front name for the Church of Spiritual Technology.
CST claims to own the copyrights and trademarks of Dianetics and Scientology.


- - - - - - -

 

Suppressive Reasonableness

The following types of people have justifiers for the overt of altering LRH issues:

1. Those who are guilty of altering LRH issues.
2. Those who have a low confront of evil.
3. Those in fear of RTC = PTS.
4. Those who have some vested interest to protect, for example, a business.

All of the above types of people are reasonable about the High Crime (suppressive act) of altering LRH issues. Because they cannot confront the overt committed, they attempt to explain it all away instead of applying KSW and bringing the offenders to justice.


Here are some examples of justifiers given:

1. Mike and Virginia must have overts.

Fact –
Even if Mike and Virginia were bank robbers it would not change the fact that the suppressive management is guilty of the High Crime of altering LRH issues.

2. Nothing important was changed.

Fact –
To name just a few important changes - Axiom 3, GPM data, the false datum on tone arm action, and C/S Series 73. The statement that nothing important was changed is a lie.

3. We needed a new copyright for LRH issues that fell into the public domain.

Fact –
This is a false solution for LRH issues falling into the public domain. The correct solution would be to get even more on-source so that people would gladly come to you because they are getting wonderful case gains from standard tech. Squirreling the tech sabotages case gain. Making copyrights more important than case gain is an altered importance.

Not to mention the fact that whatever LRH copyrights fell into the public domain, will remain in the public domain forever. No LRH copyrights were recovered by the false solution of altering LRH issues and then getting a new copyright on their squirrel issue.


Here is a quote from HCOPL 7 December 1969 The Ethics Officer, His Character

Reasonableness is suppressive since it lets oppression continue without action being taken. Suppressive reasonableness is a common trait. It comes from THE INABILITY TO CONFRONT EVIL.

 

End Phenomena for Auditing Overts

Altering LRH issues is a High Crime. It is an overt of magnitude. That’s the truth.

When a person justifies an overt, this is what he is saying:

"It wasn’t really an overt because of (whatever justifier)."

That statement is always a lie, no matter what justifier he has for it.
Because the as-is-ness of any overt is that it IS an overt.

The person is practicing alter-is-ness (lies) by saying it is not an overt.

The auditor’s job is to get the person to as-is the overt.

That means getting the person to realize it IS an overt.


From LRH tape lecture - 2 July 1964 O/W Modernized and Reviewed:


"What overt have you committed?"

Think, think, think, think, think, think, think, think, think. "Well, I upset Joe."

"All right. Fine." You think you’ve gotten some place now. Of course you haven’t gotten anyplace: your tone arm hasn’t moved; there’s been no cognition – there’s been nothing like this.

Now, you think perhaps that his having told you, now, should somehow or another magically discharge this thing. No, why should it magically discharge it? He hasn’t answered the auditing question, for one thing. He doesn’t think it was an overt.

And you say, well, O/W doesn’t work because nothing happened. Man, you didn’t even get your big toenail wet on the side of the Pacific. The sixty-four dollar question now is "Well, why wasn’t it an overt?"

"Oh, well, it wasn’t an overt because Joe is a heel and because of this and because of that, and so forth, and he deserved it, and it’s the common thing to do in those circumstances; everybody expected me to do it, and of course it was natural that I would because I have a reactive bank, and it forced me to do it."

Now, a guy can go on for some time on the justification of this overt. And you start to get tone arm action, tone arm action, tone arm action.

Until you get the thing worn down and eventually, all of a sudden he says, "Well, even though it could have been explained, you know, that was one hell of a thing to do to Joe. I shouldn’t have done that to Joe. I’d completely forgotten. I had it completely in my choice whether I did it or didn’t do it. And I did it.

And you see it blow. You got one "done," see, one "done" off the pc.

Now there is the auditing of O/W.

----End of quote from the LRH tape ----


All those people who have justifiers for the suppressive act of altering LRH issues, need to be audited on their justifiers until they reach the end phenomena –

That altering LRH issues is an overt of magnitude – it is a suppressive act.

The as-is-ness of any overt is – that it IS an overt. That is the truth of it.

 

Barrier to Theta Clear and OT

OT is not a piece of paper that states you finished a grade chart action.

The four states attainable with Scientology tech are:

Clear = Tone 4
Theta Clear = Tone 8
Cleared Theta Clear (OT) = Tone 20
Free Spiritual Being = Tone 40

Not only do these states have a tone level but they have certain abilities. A piece of paper that says one has attained these states when one does not have the tone level and abilities of that state – is a false piece of paper.


Those attempting to reach Theta Clear and OT inside the Church cannot make it. The Exisiting Scene inside the Church is that a suppressive top management has altered LRH issues. Scientologists inside the Church have a responsibility to apply KSW and bring the offenders to justice. It is an overt of omission if they do not do that and that makes them also guilty of the suppressive act. Those who carry out an illegal order are just as guilty as those who gave it.

So, Scientologists inside the Church are committing a daily suppressive act of doing nothing about the fact that top management has altered LRH issues. The reason for this is they are afraid of RTC, and that means they are PTS to RTC. So, all attestations to OT inside the Church are false because a person who is at 1.0 (fear) on the tone scale and who is PTS, is doing the attesting.


Here is a quote from HCOB 23 December 1959 Responsibility

"If the definition of operating thetan is knowing and willing cause over all dynamics then we can see at once that responsibility must go hand in hand with making an operating thetan."

The Chart of Attitudes and the Chart of Human Evaluation state that courage and responsibility both exist above 4.0 on the tone scale.

So, two of the traits of an OT are – courage and responsibility on all dynamics.

Any attestations to OT inside the Church are false because the people doing the attesting – do not have the tone level, traits and abilities of an OT.


The barrier to Theta Clear and OT inside the church is this:

You will have to have the courage level and responsibility level to apply KSW to RTC.

Not doing that – pins your tone level to 4.0 at best, so OT is out of your reach.

And there is no way to fake or pretend your way around that.

 

When you exhibit a high courage and responsibility level – then you can be an OT.